Friday, December 24, 2010

Thursday, December 23, 2010

Handbag Cakes Step By Step

September 11: Towards a shift of scientific opinion?




baston This scientist does has little meaning to the extent that the camp
opponent will always be able to produce 10 times more with
references at least equal or superior.
In fact, the shape is unimportant relative to the bottom, because experts and experts-cons will compete long time.

By cons, in hindsight, it is quite obvious that such an operation, planning and even more success, can not possibly be the work of a band of retards who train in simulators and steered the zincs with plastic cutlery and small cutters, all led by a fanatic in a cave. To this end, swinging a huge airliner at full speed into a building is like wanting to seek a match with a dart, go.

All this has only relative importance to the examination without the convenience of skiing: Planning a
operation of this magnitude requires hundreds of people and years.
dormant agents, infiltrators, financial coordinators, liaison officers, stewardship, suicide bombers, and the necessary fuses. These circuits must be triplets, quadruplets and more, completely sealed from each other. The governing structure is on top of a pyramid, whose agents must be interchangeable, expendable and replaceable at any time immediately.

The financial circuits themselves require at least as many staff as operational land, and organized the same way. The liaison officers interface type finance / logistics / stewardship / land must be multiplied, also replaceable, and almost impossible to compartmentalize. Financial resources for all these networks are logically imply huge and so vast networks of bleaching. Planners must be present on every continent, at every stage, and own their own networks. Communications at all levels to be effective need to be multiplying endlessly, but can never be totally safe.
capabilities of leakage of security are still other networks to maintain and control that must be Therefore the material resources to be effective.

Each planning stage must have multiple alternative scenarios and a single man can not be the sole custodian of all complex operations at all levels.
Transversality level flowchart of intermediaries is a huge weakness.
Such networks can be free of seepage and leakage, which makes it even more hypothetical completely successful.

But the worst is ahead The infiltration.
infiltration of the workings of the U.S. administration at the highest level and in all directions civil aviation at the Pentagon through NORAD, claiming lives devoted to it, to sabotage, camouflage, and set fire windows. Again, we would find the same mode as the operational part, but much more sensitive in planning, communications, connections and reporters. Part information is crucial in the context of this operation.
At this level the device, the Ratag one of them cancels the operation.

The total for all underground is logically inconceivable.

To be credible, that is exactly what the commission official Kean / Hamilton would have to update.

And what have we gotten instead? Totally bullshit assumptions that have no relation to an operational mode of such magnitude. In their defense, the commission has received only $ 600 000 for work, Kenneth Starr has had 40 million to prove that Bill had stained Monica's dress. Since there are 5 times more resources assigned to investigations of violations of the embargo on Cuba for pursuing bin Laden.

Beyond, not the "small" member of the intelligence services, no military, no country will swallow the official version, and for good reason: The real

power to harm terror cells as we know, is extremely limited.
A truck bomb in the WTC in 1993. A boat packed with explosives against the USS Cole in Yemen in 2000. Some cars against embassies. In London and Madrid, this is more or less successful operations, individual authors and are immediately arrested while their pathetic network is identified and dismantled. What makes the unpredictability of such actions is the very nature of these cells: Single, independent, and a horizontal organization. The opposite of what we have seen above.

How not see evidence the difference in scale between these mosquito bites and an operation such as that from 11/09?
It is also impossible that a terrorist group possesses such a potential nuisance, then who but a powerful intelligence service, own and control the whole chain?

Above all, keep in mind that Operation Northwood (1962), was already planning to kill large numbers of U.S. citizen by his government, with airline and military strikes on buildings.

The current problem, posed by the work on the alternative hypothesis is from 11/09 its great disparity. It is essential to read everything, see everything, to reconstitute the full thread of events. And only then will we have a very clear overview and in which the official story irrefutably appears as a blatant lie.
This effort is essential, because this event is shaping our present and our future, until the possibility of provoking a nuclear conflict. Until this myth will not be dismantled, we will have no opportunity to significantly halt the administration and nihilistic capitalist United States of America.



September 11: Towards a shift of scientific opinion?

Recently, the chemical engineer Mark Basile has confirmed, after testing, the presence of highly flammable materials like nano-thermite (a substance exothermic Hi-Tech exclusively for military use can instantly melt steel) in rubble of the World Trade Center [see his interview filmed ], corroborating the results of analysis of physicist Steven Jones of chemist Niels Harrit University of Copenhagen, and more recently the geo-physicist CNRS researcher and retired Andre Rousseau which we published the study is only available to our association ReOpen911 in May 2010.

These tests need to be considered a priori as farfetched? ReOpen911's opinion is clear: this is simply not possible. Indeed, besides the fact that their authors are experts in resume well filled and perfectly credible, the theory of controlled demolition by the addition of external energy (either by explosives or substances exothermic) is, objectively, the only one to date manages to explain all phenomena observed:
  • Almost perfect symmetry of the three collapses.
  • Observation of horizontal projections and "explosive" materials during the collapse of the Twin Towers, which beams weighing up to 20 tons [see analysis of these images ejections by physics professor David Chandler].
Collapse of WTC 2: its mass is projected in all directions
Ejections "explosive" material under the curtain of falling debris ;
beam embedded in a tower more than 100 m from the WTC
  • The presence of molten steel in the ruins of the WTC.

molten steel in the ruins of WTC
Satellite image of 16 Sep.01 showing thermal heat sources "abnormal"
elements of steel and concrete compacted and fused

studies and analysis above are they provided in the right? It does not belong to the association ReOpen911 to proclaim itself the arbiter and final judge on this issue. However, the situation is now as follows: we observe a strong and constant acceleration in the pace of publishing studies and scientific analysis that refutes the official version of the collapse of three towers of the World Trade Center. The scientific community would she about to switch on the side of questioning the official version? Note that the proponents of the official version are often not independent, beginning with experts NIST, the agency U.S. government which was responsible for the official investigation into the collapse WTC towers, and under the Department of Commerce (Chairman of the agency that made the reports so controversial was appointed by George W. Bush).
The scientists who dispute the official version, still more, came together in associations or professional groups dedicated to the pursuit of truth and calling for a new investigation:

Architects & Engineers for 9 / 11 Truth , a U.S. involving more than 1,300 architects and engineers [see interview filmed the founder of the association ].

Scientists for 9 / 11 Truth , an association of more than 60 leading U.S. scientists (chemists, physicists, geophysicists ...) [ see the analysis of the NIST report on the collapse of the Twin Towers by physicist Steven Jones and Kevin Ryan chemical engineer].

The Collective for Francophone Scientific Truth September 11, a young group established in September 2010 which brings together scientists whose geo-French physicist and retired researcher at CNRS Andre Rousseau. ;
For all these reasons, the association ReOpen911 calls for public debate on the collapse of three WTC towers . The mainstream media obviously have a role to play in establishing truth function they perform now sometimes (often still too few) in a number of foreign countries, including the United States where even Fox News has made a radical shift in the media coverage of September 11 .
On November 13, barely more than a month after a first issue Fox News which gave the opportunity to Lt. Col. Anthony Shaffer and former member of the CIA Michael Scheuer denounce the fact that there had been cover-ups on September 11 "at the highest levels of government," chain ultraconservative invited on board the news program "Geraldo at Large" two personalities of the Movement for Truth on September 11. The purpose of the program: discuss TV campaign "Building What?" whose objective is to obtain a new investigation into the extraordinary collapse of WTC 7, the third tower to have collapsed Sept. 11, 2001.

before an audience of over one million viewers, the very popular host Geraldo Rivera, who until recently was an outspoken critic of the Movement for Truth on 11 / 9, now recognized to have changed his positions. He concluded the show by saying: "This is something intriguing. I am much more open about it than I was, and because of the commitment of the families of 11 / 9, and all those engineers and architects. Its sounds like a confession mea culpa. Watch this Fox News show subtitled in French:

This is a great success for the campaign "Building What?" ReOpen911 which is an official partner with the families of victims, survivors and rescue workers September 11 represented by the association NYCCAN .
ReOpen911 The association, like the French scientific Collective for Truth on September 11, invited the French scientists - physicists, chemists and civil engineers - to consider issues raised by the collapse of three WTC towers and realize their own studies and tests . At their attention, we have attached to this article a reference list comprising official reports by NIST and a selection of studies and scientific analysis of reference, some support the official version, others disagree.
-La-writing ReOpen911
Bibliography
few studies and analysis of reference supporting the official version (in chronological order):
few studies and analysis of reference that refutes the official version (in chronological order):

Wednesday, December 22, 2010

Disconnect Letter Telephone

Do you know the X-37 drone B?


The Boeing X-37 Advanced Technology Demonstrator is a prototype space shuttle unmanned developed by NASA beginning in 1999, aimed at developing new technologies for takeoffs and orbital receipts and atmospheric to prepare the replacement of the U.S. space shuttle . It is a small craft weighing less than 6 tons, with a cargo hold, and with a large orbital maneuver capability.
The X-37 is fully automated and is derived from the X-40A expanded by approximately 20%. In 2004, Following the removal of the project budget, the X-37 is taken up by the DARPA, the U.S. military research agency. In 2006, for financial reasons, it passes control to the Air Force U.S. has since continued its development. Its first flight took place on atmospheric 7 April 2006 in California, at Edwards AFB . The first launch took place in orbit the 22 April 2010 [ a ] . The missions that could fill the X-37 to serve the air force are not known because the project is now classified as confidential. We suppose it could be used in the fight against hostile satellites.


abnormally high temperatures in central Russia has already caused enormous economic losses. A fifth was destroyed crops and food prices could increase significantly leading the fall. Moscow is caught in the smoke from the fires of peatlands. The experts' forecasts are far from reassuring: droughts, hurricanes and floods will be repeated more often and be more violent. Alexei Kokorin, Program Director Climate and Global Energy Fund for Nature (WWF), explained that "the current trend (the drought) will not stop, it is not by chance ..." That
an employee of an influential international organization working in different regions of the world under the cover of environmental programs is so well informed is very significant. And that is not reducible to the famous "global warming" which is the subject of intense debate scientists and others. The theory of "global warming" as a natural cycle requires at least evidence, whereas the current heat wave, observed, moreover, exclusively in the territory of Russia and its neighboring areas, could Deputy hear more natural scientific explanations.

The problem of controlling the weather, as a form of social regulation, has been discussed since the 1970s by Zbigniew Brzezinski in his book Between Two Centuries. It is clear that the American geopolitical expert could not but ask the question on the possibility use various forms of climate impact both on social and geopolitical. Other authors have also written serious about this, although for obvious reasons, it is unlikely that information about the discoveries in the field of creating and testing a weapon climate being disclosed one day.
In 2000, Michel Chossudovsky, professor of economics at the University of Ottawa, wrote about the possibility of a partial change of climate as a result of the use of a new generation of "non-lethal weapons." Americans work on the ability to control the climate in various regions of the world, this technology is developed under the High-frequency Active Aural Research Program (HAARP), capable of causing phenomena such as droughts, hurricanes, earthquakes land and floods. From a military standpoint, HAARP is a weapon of mass destruction, an instrument of expansion that can selectively destabilize ecological systems and agricultural countries and regions targeted. The basic technique known program is a system of transmitters designed to study electromagnetic processes in the ionosphere and composed of 360 radio transmitters and 180 antennas with a height of 22 meters. Emitting in the sky 3600 kilowatts station became the most powerful facility in the world can act on the ionosphere. The program, launched in 1990, is funded by the Directorate of Marine Research and the Research Laboratory of the U.S. Air Force with the participation of the largest universities.
All this gives substance to rumors and assumptions. We could still continue to laugh Hugo Chavez said that the devastating earthquake in Haiti by the implementation HAARP , but similar assumptions have been made after the earthquake in Sichuan province of China in 2008. In addition, a series of facts shows that the U.S. program that aims to change the climate in countries and regions in a systematic character is now affecting the space environment.
For example, April 22, 2010, the X-37B unmanned U.S. has been launched on the orbit of the Earth and could, according to some sources, carry on board new models of laser weaponry. The New York Times, Pentagon officials strongly deny any relationship between the camera and any offensive weapons but admitted that he intended to attend military ground operations and complete various missions auxiliaries. The X-37B was built 11 years ago already under a NASA program, and in 2006 this program was sent to the U.S. Air Force under the seal of secrecy defense in for its intended purpose and budget.
requirements to lift the veil of secrecy defense on the experiments conducted in Alaska have never ceased to be expressed in the United States and other countries. In Russia have similar requirements never been expressed so noisy. Nevertheless, it appears that climate change in the service of political interests are far from being a myth, and soon Russia and the rest of the world would face a new kind of threat. Developments in the field of climate arms seem to reach the "expected output capacity, resulting in droughts, destroying crops and causing the territory of the" target "a series of anomalous phenomena.




A scenario for 2025
technology and cyber space warfare is so new and untested that even the most bizarre scenarios may soon be overwhelmed by a reality still difficult to conceive. However, if we use just the type of scenarios that the U.S. Air Force itself has used in its 2009 Future Capabilities game, we can get "a better understanding of how air, space and cyberspace coincide in the art of war "and then start to imagine how the next world war could actually be delivered!
It is 11:59 p.m. on Thursday for Thanksgiving in 2025. While crowds flock to online shops and they hammer the gates of Best Buy for big discounts on the latest home electronics from China, technicians from the U.S. Air Force, the Space Telescope Monitoring Maui [ Hawaii], cough on their coffee while their widescreen suddenly become black. At thousands of miles, cyber command center in Texas, the cyber fighters quickly detect malicious binary codes which, although launched anonymously, shows the thumbprint separate Army People's Liberation of China.
This first open attack had been planned by anyone. The "malicious software" takes control of robotics aboard a U.S. drone solar powered, the "Vulture," while flying at 70,000 feet above the Straits of Tsushima between Korea and Japan. Suddenly he pulls all the modules of rockets that are below its gigantic scale of 135 meters, sending dozens of missiles lethal plunge harmlessly in the Yellow Sea, thus effectively disarming this terrible weapon.
Determined to meet sudden for once, the White House authorizes retaliatory strikes. Confident that its system of satellites F-6, "split and free-flying" is impenetrable, the commanders of the Air Force in California transmit codes robotic fleet of UAVs space X B-37 orbiting at 450 kilometers above the Earth, ordering them to launch their missiles triple terminator on the 35 Chinese satellites. No response. Near panic, the U.S. Air Force launches its Falcon hypersonic cruise vehicle in an arc of 160 kilometers above the Pacific Ocean and then, just 20 minutes later, sending the computer codes to take missiles against seven Chinese satellites in low orbit. The launch codes are suddenly inoperative. As
as the Chinese virus is spreading irresistibly across the architecture of F-6 satellites and supercomputers that these second-class Americans are unable to crack the code devilishly complex malicious program, the GPS signals crucial to the navigation of ships and U.S. planes in the world are compromised. Fleets of aircraft carriers begin to circle in the middle of the Pacific. Squadrons of fighter planes are grounded. Drones fly aimlessly reapers to the horizon, crashing when their fuel is exhausted. Suddenly, the United States is losing what the U.S. Air Force has long called "the ultimate high ground combat" space. Within hours, the world power that has dominated the planet for nearly a century has been defeated in World War III without causing human casualties.

A new world order?

Although future events are more dull than what is suggested by these four scenarios, all trends point to a significant decline much more striking of U.S. power by 2025 that all Washington seems now consider.
While the allies [U.S.] in the world are beginning to realign their policies to meet rising Asian powers, the cost of maintaining the 800 or more military bases abroad will simply become unsustainable, eventually forcing Washington to withdraw gradually against the heart. With China and the United States who are in a race to the militarization of outer space and cyberspace, tensions between the two powers will certainly rise, making military conflict by 2025 at least plausible or less guaranteed.
To further complicate things, economic trends, military and technological briefly described above will not act so clearly isolated. As happened with the European empires after the Second World War, these negative forces will prove undoubtedly synergistic. They combine so completely unexpected, create crises that Americans are totally unprepared and threaten to send the economy into a sudden downward spiral, pushing the country into economic misery, for a generation or more.
As U.S. power fades, the past offers a range of possibilities for a future world order. At one end of the spectrum, the rise of a new global superpower, albeit unlikely, can not be ruled out. However, China and Russia appear both self-referential culture, writings abstruse non-Roman regional defense strategies and legal systems underdeveloped, challenging their key instruments for world domination. So in this case, no superpower seems to succeed in the United States. In
a black version of our cons-utopian future world, it is conceivable that a coalition of transnational corporations, multilateral forces like NATO and an international financial elite to develop a supranational network instability that would make any sense to the very idea of national empires. While companies and denationalized elites led multinational so usurped such a world safe from the urban enclaves, the multitudes would be relegated to land, rural or urban, abandoned.
In Planet of Slums [planet slums] Mike Davis offers at least a partial view from the bottom to the top of such a world. His argument is that the billion people (two billion by 2030) already crammed into fetid slums like favelas around the world, will be "wild and cities bankrupt Third World [...] the characteristic of the battlespace 21st century. " Then as darkness settles on some future super-slums, "the empire can deploy Orwellian technologies of repression," while "type of helicopter gunships hunting hornet enigmatic enemies in the narrow streets of the slums ... Every morning the slums responded with suicide bombers and eloquent explosions. "
the middle of this spectrum of possible futures, a new oligopoly might emerge between 2020 and 2040, with rising powers China, Russia, India and Brazil working with declining powers like Great Britain, Germany, Japan and the United States, to impose an ad hoc global domination, similar to the rough alliance of European empires that ruled half of humanity in 1900.
Another possibility: the rise of regional hegemons in return to something reminiscent of the international system in place before the modern empires are formed. In this neo-Westphalian world order, with its endless opportunities for micro-violence and uncontrolled exploitation, every hegemon dominates its immediate region - Brazil in South America, North America Washington, Pretoria, South Africa, etc.. The space, cyberspace and the deep sea, removed from the control of the former "policeman" warming, the United States, could even become the new common global, controlled by a Security Council expanded UN or other ad hoc institution.
All these scenarios extrapolate future trends existing on the assumption that the Americans, blinded by the arrogance of decades of power without historical precedent, can not take or not take steps to manage uncontrolled erosion of their position World.
If the decline of America is in fact a trajectory of 22 years between 2003 and 2025, while the Americans have already wasted most of the first decade of this decline with wars that have diverted the problems in the long -term and, in the same way that water is consumed rapidly by the desert sands, trillions of dollars wasted terribly necessary.
If there is only 15 years, the risk of wasting them all is still high. Congress and the President [U.S.] are now at an impasse, the U.S. system is overwhelmed by the money of large corporations that block plants, and little suggests that any issue of importance, including American wars, the national security state America's bloated, his impoverished educational system and its energy supply archaic, will be treated seriously enough to ensure the kind of soft landing that would maximize the role and prosperity of the United States in a changing world.
empires of Europe are gone and the supreme power of the United States continues. It seems increasingly unlikely that the U.S. will get something that looks one way or another to the success of Britain, to shape a world order managed to protect their interests, preserve their prosperity and bears the mark their best values.



Monday, December 20, 2010

Shingles Under The Breasts

Implementation of DALO



Draft Press Release prepared by the Housing Commission


"The state can not remain outside the law"


Democratic Movement endorsed the cry of the committee monitoring the implementation of the right to housing . Despite the significant increase in the number of relocations, the number of applicants without a priority offer of housing at 30 June 2010 was 14,000 (including 12,500 for the Paris region alone). This figure has doubled since a year and increases the number of appeals.


How can we speak of security for citizens while the basic right youth, seniors and families have a roof is not respected in France?
How can credit the government for resolute action against the poor housing that instead of taxing the wealthiest among us to help victims of the crisis, chooses to make cuts in the budgets of public housing or in allocations to communities?

Democratic Movement calls for national unity on this issue so that our citizens may one day no longer afraid of ending up on the street the hazards of destiny. Every effort must be put in line to meet the emergency and work to eliminate the deficit in housing construction last 25 years.

Enough words, it is now as we are invited to the monitoring committee "to leave the Ile-de-France impasse" so that the great Paris is first that of its inhabitants. It should also accelerate the fight against inadequate housing and substandard housing throughout France. Let us give meaning to the policy by allowing it to change the natural course of self-interest to promote a more humane society.

Democratic Movement solemnly demand a debate on these issues so that the committee's proposals for monitoring the implementation of the right to housing are implemented.

___________________________________________________________________
link for the full report
:

http://medias.lemonde.fr/mmpub/edt/doc/20101215/1453894_b475_4e_rapport_comite_de_suivi_dalo.pdf

Norton Cltlmh.exe Conhost.exe

Roland Dumas: "September 11, I do not believe." And you?


Roland Dumas: "September 11, I do not believe it." And you?


Roland Dumas : "le 11 septembre, je n'y crois pas". Et vous ?
Karl Zero, Jean-Marie Bigard, Marion Cotillard, Mathieu Kassovitz ... So far, people who dared question the dogma of the official version of September 11, except atypical case of journalist troublemaker mid mid entertainer, belonged to the middle of the show. Now here is a new voice has risen, this time coming from the political sphere, not a small level: Former foreign minister (1984-1986) and Foreign Affairs (1988-1993) before assuming the presidency of the Constitutional Council - which he has illustrated include uttering the validation campaign accounts illegal Jacques Chirac and Edouard Balladur, but that's another story - Roland Dumas made his coming out on the issue of debate Tonight or Never France 3 on Thursday. "I'll tell you what I think about Sept. 11: I do not think" , he dropped . Follows a hubbub - imagine, it comes to blaspheme Live! - Hence escapes "You live on 11 September" addressed collectively probably his three opponents, the very Atlanticist Pierre Lellouche, Secretary of State for Foreign Trade, the philosopher and Therese Delpech essayist Guy Sorman, then, in response to an indignant "There are limits" : "The limits are those you set, it is not mine. Me, I hate this attempt intellectual dictatorship which has no raison d'etre . He explained to Oumma.com : " You said last night's show Taddeï Frederick does not believe in Sept. 11. What do you mean by that? Well, I think it can not be more clear! I do not believe what was told about it.
What do you do referring specifically?
There are a lot of facts abnormal in the official version. I read and studied a lot of research done on this issue. Many items do not: just look, for example, if the hole in the plane into the Pentagon, much too small, or on other lesser known aspects.
The official version you think she more deceptive or incomplete?
Again, just take a serious look on it to get an idea. I do not want, for now, come back to that and comment on reviews, but actually, the official version does not. "
In fact, in the general media indifference, the site Reopen 9 / 11 has published in November the video interview a chemist who, after analysis of dust from the World Trade Center (WTC ), revealed the presence of nanothermite after five other researchers before him reached the same conclusion. Nanothermite which is an ingredient used in controlled demolitions . And December 7, the same site has set line, without echo, a fascinating article in Foreign Policy Journal explains how the investigation of insider trading around September 11 (eg speculation against airlines and insurers affected), assessed by the former German minister Andreas von Bulow to 15 billion euros, were model denial. Here is the conclusion: " In the first days following the 9 / 11, financial regulators around the world expressed unprecedented elements showing the existence of insider trading in connection with the terrorist attacks of that day. The president of a central bank (Welteke) explained that there were "incontrovertible evidence" such financial transactions. This evidence led U.S. regulators to take oath before Congress, to bring those responsible to justice. These promises were not kept, as exemplified by the attitude of those in charge of the investigation, which cleared the responsibility of suspects by superficial investigations, and concluded that insider trading could not have occurred, they were not made directly by Osama bin Laden or al Qaeda. "thorough investigations" conducted by the FBI relied upon the report of the Commission on 11 / 9, were clearly biased. the FBI did not hear the suspects and did not seem to want to approach the Commission on 11 / 9 for the Comparative Study of notes to determine which of the respondents were likely to relate with al-Qaeda. The synthesis of the memorandum Commission suggests that the FBI simply took decisions on its own as regards the possible relationship between the suspects and the alleged terrorist organizations. These unilateral decisions were not appropriate, given that at least three potential cases of insider trading (those of Walker, the trader Viisage and that of Wellington Management) involved logically links with Osama bin Laden or his family . Another suspect (Elgindy) was a criminal about to be convicted, and had direct links with employees FBI arrested latest security breach ... The FBI also defended in August 2003 that he had no knowledge of hard disks recovered from the WTC , what had [yet] been publicly announced in 2001. According to those who have collected the relevant data, hard disks have revealed "repugnant transactions of the Last Judgement" (dirty doomsday dealings). The indices of insider trading around the 11 / 9 involve numerous financial channels, from stocks to Treasury bills, through transfer credit card facts WTC just before its destruction. Today we know that financial experts worldwide have provided strong evidence, using proven and reliable statistical techniques, showing that the earlier suspicions of experts were justified and that the insider trading of 11 / 9 actually occurred. People knew in advance the crimes of 11 / 9 and they took advantage. These people are among us today, and our families and communities may suffer further terrorist attacks and new financial crimes if we do not take account of this evidence. It is time to open an independent investigation and international insider trading and traders who took advantage of the terrorist acts of September 11. " And on September 11 themselves! In reality, the attitude of the proponents of the official, who excommunicate their opponents in all of the taxing "conspiracy" , is best summarized by the following illustration.

Friday, December 10, 2010

Can We Use Word Deceased With Father

"New threat to social housing" for Rudolph Thomas

Press Release proposed by the Commission National Housing and incorporated by Rodolphe Thomas

After being forced to back down on tax Appeared tax (which would be levied on rents) the government is preparing to be a further blow to finance social housing.

In fact, it is a primary source of funding that the government is addressing: the money that paid for housing agencies, can build.
was far from the Caisse d'Epargne and La Poste that French cast their economies on a Livret A Nearly 75 percent of that money was then collected by the Caisse des Depots et Consignations (CDC). then redistributes that money CDC public housing agencies through loans, grants to rehabilitate or construct. It works well for years, for the good of all.
A decree intended to do in preparation to leave only 50 percent of funds to the CDC. This money will be reduced to a minimum, a portion of that decline inexorably every year: it will, every time less and less money for housing construction and more and more money for speculation. How many homes are not built for lack of funds? How many applications for housing will remain unfulfilled? As has become customary, the government prefers money to justice. By pretending to make housing a priority and act for justice, the government proves that only financial markets matter to him. The Democratic Movement condemned the policy.
It proposes to maintain a rate of 75 percent for at least the compulsory payments of funds on a booklet A where it is open, the Caisse des Depots et Consignations she is able to continue the policy of social housing.

Unblocknasza-klasa.pl

FORCE WORK FOR THE UNEMPLOYED IN ANGLETTERE!

In recent weeks, while the suggestion Cantona sowed a bit of panic in the Establishment, how not to have been arrested by the free labor of the unemployed in England? Work more, earn less, we knew. Work harder to keep his job, we knew too. But forced to work to earn almost nothing except his unemployment benefit is new, it comes out in England. And inevitably, it will soon cross the Channel. Question: How far do we go down in submission of the people? Restore as much outright slavery! While the banksters give themselves bonuses and do their business in The City, the unemployed British forced to work to reach their modest benefits. It is believed nightmares but it's true and it is in line with the New World Order.

Who Can Send Me An Invitation Letter To Kosovo

BANKRUN: LINK to send photos of your withdrawals

- For DAB citizens: pictures of your withdrawals! PDF Imprimer Envoyer
antibanksters Dear friends!
As it is impossible to know if the Bankrun December 7 2010 has worked (for obvious reasons of propaganda), I suggest you send a page in the forum pictures of your withdrawals or account closures (anonymous:)!) To get an idea of the magnitude of the movement . Some friends went with me showing me their withdrawals, and the act becomes concrete and antibankster takes shape (which here are two photographs). € 50 or 5000, everything is good for casting banksters ... We must continue to withdraw your money from these greedy thugs until the collapse of their miserable and wretched world. December 7 this was only the beginning of the march towards the destruction of their exorbitant power, do not lose hope, victory will go to you can be certain. ATMs citizens ...
Post your photos on this topic in our forum: http://novusordoseclorum.discutforum.com/photographies-de-vos-retraits-f33/marseille-2-retraits-du-7-decembre-t5878.htm
In last resort, send your pictures to the following email: lelibrepenseur@free.fr This email address is protected against spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it.
Very simple to do, simply click on the image and host your picture.
LLP

Ketoconazole How Long To Work

Sabotage at the nerve center of U.S. government 11 / 9? Who benefits


According to the article documented below, it is likely that the traitors within the government and the U.S. military have acted to prevent an effective military response against the hijacking of planes and the attacks on 11 September 2001.



Answers Central Command Pentagon delayed several times Sept. 11
Posted Shoestring911 Sunday, November 7, 2010
https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjhyphenhyphenjIKXt5Mt3cMmDJmYjI1U1yW8hyZ8s5c_axb7mIRUaP9akHQxSfOQkPGUllzlHALgb2adIQlTt5ov4HTGhBss4wJYrLBIjXOw2umXWrooB0G05EF4H5TIBDtu5FwGrII_U0cM5NwpKX7/s1600/NMCC.jpg
The National Military Command Center ( National Military Command Center, the NMCC) is the safest part of the Pentagon. During the attacks of 11 / 9, it was "the focal point of assistance within the Department of Defense" for policing in response to the hijacking of airplanes in U.S. airspace. [1] According to the Commission on 11 / 9, the work of the NMCC was to "bring the parties concerned to establish the chain of command between the National Command Authority - the president and defense minister - and those who were execute orders "[2] in response to the attacks on New York and Washington. That day, the NMCC was therefore a particularly crucial role. Yet the evidence suggests that the emergency actions taken by the Centre were totally inadequate. Many obstacles presented themselves: in addition to technical problems, outside agencies could not provide the necessary information to the Centre. Furthermore, several military leaders were slow to arrive at the NMCC where they could participate in emergency response efforts, they did not arrive until the end of attacks: it was too late to intervene. The data currently
available are insufficient to draw definitive conclusions. But many factors have impeded the actions of those present at the NMCC, combined with other oddities, raise the possibility of a deliberate and coordinated effort on the part of traitors to the U.S. government and military insiders to sabotage the Centre's ability to respond to the attacks of Sept. 11, when his immediate response was imperative.
"The nerve center U.S. ARMY WORLD"
The NMCC has been described as "a hub of communications, a standard for connecting the Pentagon, the civilian government, and the commanders of combat. "[3] It is a warren of offices, cubicles and conference rooms in an area where the Pentagon are the offices of the State Joint Staff and those of many senior officials, including Minister of Defense. The center is designed to operate in an emergency and has its own electrical, heating and air conditioning. [4] The main NMCC's task is to monitor events around the world for the Committee of Chiefs of Staff. His other main tasks are to provide an element of intelligence and crisis response. At the time of the attacks of 9 / 11, it's up to five teams in rotation, each management team is composed of 17 to 20 people responsible for various functions. [5]
OFFICERS LACK OF REACTIVITY IN RESPONSE TO THE FIRST CRASH
the morning of September 11, 2001, staff monitored the information that the NMCC received numerous live television, and staff present at the NMCC learned the first plane crash into the World Trade Center by the television news bulletins. [6] It would have been the first time they were informed of the crisis that was played in the skies over America that morning. [7]
NMCC staff did not realize that the crash was a terrorist attack. The Head of Operations, Dan Mangino, recalled: " At first we thought it was a terrible accident. [8] Major Charles Chambers:" I thought the pilot had used the laps to move into the zone, he lost consciousness, and that the autopilot had done the rest. "Therefore, at that time, " our apprehension of the crash ... was not different from that of everyone in the country ." [9]
In response, the Operations team advised the chain of command according to media reports, saying only to senior Pentagon officials that a plane had crashed against one of the WTC towers. [10]
NMCC IGNORE THE STAFF OF THE CURRENT CRISIS
The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has informed the NMCC of the first hijacking of September 11th - American Airlines Flight 11 - as to 9:00, 14 minutes after the plane hit the World Trade Center and more than 45 minutes after her alleged embezzlement. It was then that Lt. Col. Ryan Gonsalves, Chief of Operations in the NMCC, seeking information on the crisis, called the operations center at FAA headquarters office in Washington. The person who answered told Gonsalves that the FAA had a report about the hijacking of Flight 11 left Boston for Los Angeles. However, the FAA employee did not seem to realize that this was the aircraft crashed into the WTC and he told Gonsalves that Flight 11 was "now underway" to JFK International Airport in New York. In addition, the FAA employee made no request for assistance from the army on the possible launch of alert fighters to catch the hijacked plane was not mentioned, and when Gonsalves asked if the FAA had need help with the hijacking, he was told: "No ", then the driver " called to say that everything was under control and that he would land in New York shortly ." [11] According to the instructions
military in response to a hijacking in the airspace United States, the FAA should have " notify the fastest ways " the NMCC. [12] Yet, as can be seen, the NMCC learned of the hijacking of Flight 11 when he called the FAA, not the reverse. The Report of the Commission on 11 / 9 noted that although the "e FAA headquarters began to follow the protocol of diversion " after air traffic controllers had concluded that Flight 11 was hijacked at about 8 am 25, she "had not contacted the NMCC to request an escort fighter ." [13]
Lack of awareness NMCC on the alarming crisis which unfolded this morning lasted, as was evident during the strike on the Pentagon at 09:37. Captain Charles Leidig, temporarily in charge of Operations in the NMCC when the terrorist attacks, told the Commission on 11 / 9 that: " he remembered he had told CNN the plane crash into the Pentagon . [14] Steve Hahn, an operations officer in the NMCC that morning, recalled: " I did not know [that the Pentagon had been hit] until I heard the newsletter on TV. " [15] Charles Chambers said that when the Pentagon was struck (the opposite side of the building where is located the NMCC), he " heard a faint rattling noise through the vents and felt a slight vibration. " However, Has he added, "I have not heard or felt on the other, so I never got more concerned ." He did not realize that the Pentagon was attacked when he saw that on TV. [16]
eerily quiet OFFICERS IN RESPONSE TO ATTACKS
NMCC staff saw live on TV Flight 175 from United Airlines hit the south tower of World Trade Center at 9:03. Then they would have realized what was happening. Leidig said that for him, "it was obvious he was a terrorist attack or a coordinated attack." Dan Mangino recalled that personnel at NMCC "immediately knew it was a terrorist attack." [17] According
Leidig, the NMCC " then became the focal point for coordinating information flow s." [18] Yet, given the fact that this was the first attack against America 60 years, the evidence suggests a level of urgency is much less than what one could reasonably expect from those present at the Centre. Mangino said: " he knew he would have little time in the coming days, he has made so quickly in the lobby to get money from an ATM ." He has returned to NMCC that shortly after 9:37, when the Pentagon was hit. Can an Army officer in a key position rushed out to take money from an ATM if sincerely believed that the United States were the center of a massive terrorist attack?
Even after striking the Pentagon, the NMCC staff remained very calm. When Mangino returned to the Centre, he was supposedly " greeted by a sea of calm ." He remembers that " There was no panic, not a loud voice. " His colleague Steve Hahn also noted that the atmosphere at NMCC " was very professional and very quiet. [19 ] And the Vice President of Chief of Defence Staff Richard Myers said that when he arrived in the NMCC at around 10 hours it seems, " all serving officers worked quietly at their posts, despite the smoke, suspended from the ventilation system, despite the fact that the Pentagon had been struck, and despite the outbreak of disrupting the evacuation alarm . "[20]
It is plausible that this calm is merely the demonstration of the professionalism of the NMCC. Mangino As noted," We train constantly to emergencies and training has been applied . "[21] But other evidence of lack of precipitation NMCC staff make this possibility less likely. It is particularly remarkable that the man who should have been in charge of the Centre's reply on the crisis was allowed to remain at a pre-planned meeting, unrelated attacks, and he got back on the job only more one hour after the second tower of the World Trade Center was hit.
NMCC IS THE DIRECTOR OF A MEETING PRE-PLANNED
The team leader General Montague Winfield, should have been in service at the head of the Operations team as Deputy Director for Operations (DDO) at NMCC during the attacks of 9 / 11. [22] During a crisis, the responsibilities include the establishment of the DDO and the moderation of a conference call between appropriate military commanders and other relevant agencies, and the establishment of a military response. [23] Curiously, however, the previous afternoon, Winfield had asked his colleague, Charles Leidig, to take over part of its task of DDO on the morning of September 11, Leidig agreed. Leidig - who served as assistant to the Operations Command Centre, responsible for maintenance, operation and training of monitoring teams NMCC - had joined the Directorate of Operations of the Joint Staff in July 2001 with the only qualification to that of DDO NMCC, about a month before 9 / 11. He did not experience that Winfield would certainly have been invaluable in organizing a response to attacks against the United States. [24]
The reason that Winfield had wanted to take his place Leidig DDO September 11 was that he had to attend a meeting this morning. It was a " closed-door meeting convened by the Air Force personnel to discuss the ratings of the Air Force officers "according to a memorandum from the Commission on 11 / 9. [25] Another memorandum from the Commission had described as a" session general officers to rate the Air Force. "On September 11, Leidig therefore replaced Winfield as DDO 8 h 30 or 16 minutes before the first plane hit the World Trade Center. [26]
One might reasonably expect that someone one is gone for Winfield at its meeting when the second plane struck the World Trade Center, if not before, and (soon) that officers at NMCC "knew immediately that it was a terrorist attack." [27] Yet he did not. Winfield did not return to his post as more than an hour later, after the alleged crash of Flight 93 in Pennsylvania after the attacks of 9 / 11 completed. It is unclear whether Winfield and the other officers at the meeting were immediately informed of the second attack. It is also difficult to know exactly when Winfield returned to the NMCC, and if he immediately resumed his duties as DDO, or if allowed to continue Leidig in his place when he could resume his post. Leidig told the Commission on 11 / 9 be " certain that Winfield had returned" Meeting " after striking the Pentagon " to 9 h 37. [28] He also said that Winfield was replaced as DDO " just after we had learned what was going on with United 93 ", ie just after 10 pm 03. Leidig said the report by conference call on an anonymous threat against Air Force One took place at 10 h 37, " just after I found Surveillance by General Winfield. [29] This would indicate that Winfield returned to his post around 10:30.
The best explanation for the Commission on 11 / 9 provided on Winfield and breach of its core responsibilities, as it was in a place of no importance at the pre-planned, was specified in a note: "these meetings like the one attended Winfield are generally not interrupted unless a compelling reason. " [30] But a major terrorist attack in the United States is highly significant, why Winfield was not immediately returned to his position when the second WTC tower was hit? Why nobody NMCC is quickly went to him at the meeting at this time?
Considering the countless quirks identified in response to military attacks of 11 / 9, we should probably consider the possibility of a more sinister explanation for this apparent lack of urgency among those whose job was to operate the NMCC September 11. For example, they would calm it because they thought that terrorist attacks were a simulation as part of a training exercise that morning rather than actual real emergency? In such circumstances, it would have been much easier to remain calm. It is possible that people may have thought the NMCC that the terrorist attacks were simulated, even when TV images showed clearly what was happening. For example, the staff of a military base near New York who led a training exercise against terrorism this morning, thought that television pictures of the WTC on fire were actually developed a training video to accompany their exercise. An employee told a coach: " This time, you really outdid . [31]
CONFERENCE EMERGENCY only begins 9:29
Another area of concern: the serious problems encountered by staff in the NMCC in the organization and execution of an emergency teleconference to respond to terrorist attacks. The NMCC had specific procedures for crisis management. A memorandum from the Commission on 11 / 9 described it: " when a particular event occurs, the first action is to convene a major conference to gather and disseminate information from government entities according to established checklists. "[32] However, Charles Chambers recalled that the conference a major event in response to the attacks of 11 / 9 at NMCC" took more time than expected to implement . "[33] The Commander Patrick Gardner, Deputy DDO, told the Commission on 11 / 9 that the NMCC " has struggled to establish a conference " who " has not taken off as quickly as expected " he s 'was frustrated " it has not been put in place more quickly ." [34] conference a major event started only 9 am 29 or 26 minutes after entering the Flight 175 into the World Trade Center. [35]
At least two factors identified contributed to this alarming delay in the establishment of the conference: the disruption caused by [lack of] certain officers of the NMCC who would participate in another conference call, but [anyway] would have been useless in helping the emergency following the attacks, and also some problems connecting with other agencies - Especially the FAA - the conference of NMCC.
CONFERENCE UNNECESSARY DELAY OF THE CIA'S RESPONSE NMCC
A telephone conference of the National Surveillance and Intelligence Operations (NOIWON) was convened by the CIA, probably between 9:25 a.m. 9:16 a.m. ET on September 11 for allow government agencies in the Washington area quickly share information about the ongoing crisis. [36] But this call seems to have hindered rather than supported the efforts of emergency response. According to a note from the Commission on 11 / 9, the call of "NOIWON" occurred while that the NMCC was preparing for the conference a major event. The NMCC has abandoned its attempt to convene a [major conference a major event] so that its surveillance officers can participate in the conference NOIWON. "[37] Moreover, this disturbance apparently intervened to nothing. An intelligence officer working at FAA headquarters that morning said he "did not remember information useful or important in the call of NOIWON. "[38] Charles Leidig told the Commission on 11 / 9 he did not remember " a situational awareness on the part of NOIWON . "[39]
NMCC THE MEETING OF THE PROBLEMS TO CONNECT TO CIVILIAN AGENCIES
Attempts to call the conference a major event were also delayed because, as Charles Chambers pointed out," civilian agencies "that should be added to the conference" could not be contacted, others were cut after a while the connection . "[40] Leidig finally announced that the NMCC would start without these agencies could join later in the conference. [41] conference event Major ended after five minutes, then was resumed at 9 am 37 as an "air threat conference " which lasted over eight hours. [42] According to Chambers, the air threat conference occur when aircraft are considered hostile, they require many more people to a conference of major events. But as the previous conference, "it took more time than expected" to convene the conference aerial threat. There was still having trouble connecting with some agencies. Other agencies have not understood what it meant Leidig about a new conference, did not hang up when the last conference call had been disconnected. Therefore, according to Chambers: "All we heard of them, it was a busy signal. " [43]
FAA NOT COMMUNICATION
Considering the crucial responsibilities of FAA vis-à-vis the hijacking, serious problems connecting to the agency at the NMCC conference calls of particular concern. According to military instructions, the administrator of the FAA " exclusive responsibility to ensure the maintenance of order related to the hijacking or attempted hijacking in the special aircraft jurisdiction of the United States. "[44] But when he asked the FAA to provide an update on the conference a major event from its inception, the line was silent. [45] Charles Leidig said that the FAA was in line " intermittently "and" most of the time she was out of conference. "He says trouble connecting to the FAA at the conference that took place" all morning ... had hindered some extent the flow of information. " [46] Charles Chambers complained because" FAA did not participate in the conference, they could not connect in safe mode, and we could not obtain first-hand information from them. "[47] According to the report of the Commission on 11 / 9, although the operators NMCC" have worked tirelessly to include the FAA "in the conference, they met" problems of equipment and difficulty finding secure phone numbers. "[48] Sergeant Val Harrison responsible for setting up conference calls at NMCC, tried to contact the Operations Center at FAA headquarters to connect the agency's air threat conference, but did not succeed. To achieve this, she finally asked the standard of the White House, but even after the establishment of liaison with the FAA, it was repeatedly lost. [49]
The explanations have been advanced to explain these problems in connecting the FAA at the conference were at best approximate. A memorandum from the Commission on 11 / 9 are attributed simply to "problems technical. "[50] Leidig told the Commission on 11 / 9 that he understood there had been" compatibility issues "between the phone's secure FAA and NMCC secure telephones, but unaware of the technical aspects of the problem. [51] In light of many other factors that disrupted the emergency response NMCC that morning, it would be useful to check if these problems were not in fact the result a deliberate attempt to sabotage the communications between government agencies designed to ensure that the attacks on New York and Washington would take place without hindrance.
REPRESENTATIVE OF THE FAA DOES NOT RELEVANT INFORMATION
Moreover, when at 10:17 a representative of the FAA finally joined the air threat conference, it was not the appropriate person to provide required information. The representative, Rayford Brooks worked at the Central Altitude Reservation (CARF) to the command center at the FAA Herndon, Virginia. Brooks was quite incompetent to represent the FAA at the conference. According to the report of the Commission on 11 / 9, he had "no knowledge or responsibility for hijackings, no access to decision makers, and none of the information available to senior FAA officials. "Brooks did not listen the radio (in his car) before arriving at the Command Center about 9:30 am. As he told the Commission on 11 / 9, he was" unaware of the situation. "After arriving at the Command Center, Brooks received no instruction about the air threat conference or other operational issues. From the beginning, Brooks should not have participated in the conference. He had joined in place of one of the military officers working in the cell of Air Traffic Services (ATSC), a small office next to the CARF Command Centre. According to Brooks, the ATSC asked CARF monitor the air threat conference on his behalf because there was no phone function secure. [52] Considering the crucial role that the FAA was asked to play in addressing the hijacking, one might reasonably expect an employee of the FAA informed that more Rayford Brooks participated in the conference NMCC during the hijacking. Among those who worked at the command center of the FAA that morning, was there really no one more qualified?
OFFICERS ARRIVE TOO LATE TO HELP THEM TO BRING NMCC
We can see that in response to the attacks of 9 / 11, many factors have hampered the actions of those present at the NMCC. It is also interesting to note that several key officials, who normally should have been present at the NMCC, were not at the Center during the attacks, they did not arrive until it was already too late to intervene :
  • As already mentioned, Brigadier General Montague Winfield had stepped down as Deputy Director for Operations in the NMCC at 8:30, and had resumed his duties after the end of attacks, probably around 10:30.
  • Donald Rumsfeld who, as Minister of Defense has a vital role to play in defending his country against terrorist attacks, was at the Pentagon that morning. Yet it is also arrived in the NMCC until after the attacks. Rumsfeld was informed of the first attack in New York at a breakfast Working with several members of Congress. He then returned to his office for the daily briefing with intelligence from the CIA. [53] After the second plane hit the WTC, colleagues of Mr. Rumsfeld came to inform him of the situation and told him that the crisis management process had been initiated. But Rumsfeld had "wanted to spend a few phone calls" and thus remained in his office. [54] Having heard and felt the explosion when the Pentagon was struck, Rumsfeld did not go immediately to the NMCC. He went to help carry an injured person on a stretcher. Back in the building, He went first to his office. [55] He finally arrived in the NMCC and joined the air threat conference around 10:30. [56] Lieutenant-Colonel Robert Darling - who took office September 11 liaison between Vice President Dick Cheney in the situation room at the White House and the NMCC - described the problem in the actions of Mr. Rumsfeld that morning. Darling wrote: "... I think the appropriate place to have Secretary Rumsfeld was in charge of the NMCC that day ... the real questions remain: why Secretary Rumsfeld he abandoned his post that day without answering the National Military Command Center at a time when our country was attacked? "[57]
  • When the terrorist attacks took place, General Henry Shelton, who as chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staffs Joint was the the highest ranking military officer in the U.S. armed forces, took off around 7:30 am aboard a military plane, flying over the Atlantic to attend a NATO conference in Hungary. Shelton ordered turn around and returned to Washington. [58] However, he arrived in the NMCC until about 5:40 p.m. [59]
  • This morning, General Richard Myers, vice chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Joint Staffs, was on Capitol Hill, and although he saw the images of the first crash in New York to television shortly before 09:00, he continued his scheduled meeting with Senator Max Cleland. [60] Myers told the second attack on the WTC was when Cleland was with or immediately after leaving the meeting (conflict between the reports on this). [61] Some reports indicate that Myers had left the Capitol to return to the Pentagon during the Pentagon attack. [62] Myers told the Commission on 11 / 9 that he had arrived at the NMCC around 10:00 or 10:10 [63] But he had also delayed its participation in the conference air threat by leaving the NMCC to go offices of the Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld seeking. Only after an assistant told him that Rumsfeld was out as Myers returned to the NMCC. [64]
  • As Director of Operations for the Joint Staff, Vice Admiral Scott Fry was "responsible for the proper functioning of the National Military Command Center ," according to the authors Patrick Creed and Rick Newman. [65] Although he was informed of the first strike on the WTC, as he was leaving his office at the Pentagon, Fry went to his appointment from 9:00 am at the dentist. He interrupted the meeting upon receipt of the appeal of his assistant on his cell phone when the second plane hitting the World Trade Center. But then Fry instead of going to the NMCC, went to the Executive Center on the upper floors. [66] Fry had traveled to NMCC later that day, although the time of his arrival and his participation in the conference threat Air is not established ... [67]
Any new survey on 11 / 9 should determine how the absence of these senior NMCC has hampered the army's response to the attacks. In light of all the other suspicious evidence, one should seriously consider whether the absence of either of them was pre-organized as part of a deliberate attempt to cripple the U.S. Army prevent it from stopping the attacks.
EVIDENCE DETAILED ACTIONS OF THE NMCC 11 / 9 ARE NOT REVEALED
We know of several records that could say more about what happened on September 11, 2001 NMCC. These records would certainly be very useful for further investigations. They include a report after the action produced by the NMCC, on its response to the attacks of 11 / 9 which is based on notes and other documents of the time. [68] We also know that calling the conference NMCC's air threat has been registered, and that the Pentagon has produced 200 pages of classified transcript of the recording. [69] In addition, a senior NMCC has told the Commission on 11 / 9 that it has withdrawn all the tapes phones and other devices to NMCC after the attacks of 9 / 11, and put them safely in the office of the DDO. Presumably these bands still exist. [70]
Even without access to records as important as these, the already limited evidence available indicates that an alarming number of factors have hampered the emergency response to the attacks of 11 / 9 coordinated within the NMCC. Given the failure of the U.S. military to stop these attacks, there is much cause for concern. We need to know much more about what happened Sept. 11 at NMCC. Serious attempts should be undertaken to determine if deliberate and coordinated actions were carried out by traitors to the U.S. government and military insiders to disrupt efforts to implement an effective response to attacks within the NMCC.

Ten Sports Wweraw Watch

revelations Wikileaks?

Many people around us who think the world is better with than without Wikileaks. Just listen to the people interviewed by television or newspapers, talk with our colleagues or our loved ones, this opinion is widely shared. And it is true that the image of a new kind of James Bond alone against all, challenging governments and secret services of all countries, now wanted by all the world's police (Interpol just issued a warrant stop ), and taking advantage of the Internet to break the great secrets of state, has any of captivating. However, now that we are warned of possible "mental implants" mentioned Pino Cabras, ie the "hidden messages" that could convey the "September 11 of diplomacy and the Internet " should be ; our attention to the question of who truly benefits from these "revelations". That is what attaches to the journalist Hisham Hamza in this article researched and well documented published yesterday oumma.com .

Who benefits revelations Wikileaks?

International Psychodrama. Sunday, the Wikileaks site began to reveal hundreds of thousands of diplomatic relations, most classified as confidential. In Focus: the United States but also and above all, Iran, Turkey and Pakistan. Back disclosure unanimously criticized by leaders of government worldwide, with the exception of one who has welcomed today: Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

gossip about famous people: this is clear from the initial media coverage about 250,000 diplomatic memos being published by Wikileaks site and its spokesman, Julian Assange already interviewed previously by Ummah. No state secret is revealed. Sarkozy in "naked emperor, authoritative and capable," Angela Merkel dubbed "Teflon" Berlusconi amateur "wild parties", Gaddafi and his "Ukrainian nurse, blonde and voluptuous" and Putin saw as a "dominant male" geopolitics addressed from people. More interesting are the revelations, worthy of a spy thriller, the propensity of U.S. diplomats to gather any information (including DNA) on individuals identified as relevant by the State Department . Similarly, an astonishing rumor, once viewed with disdain by the zealots in Washington, is now confirmed : The United States has proposed to make a "barter" between prisoners at Guantanamo and diplomatic benefits of all kinds to various countries such as Belgium and the island republic of Kiribati. Others are more anecdotal information such as that relating to the Vice-President of Afghanistan, Ahmad Zia Massoud, carrying 52 million dollars in cash in the UAE. Another open secret is also confirmed: the preponderance of notables in the Saudi financing of Al Qaeda. More damaging for the United States is the disclosure of a memo indicating the Americans intimidation against Germany not to sue the CIA, responsible for the kidnapping in Afghanistan of a German citizen mistaken for a terrorist.
Embarrassment also affects the Middle East: Saudi Arabia, Jordan and Bahrain turn out to be vindictive supporters of a U.S. attack against Iran. Another source of embarrassment, the Yemeni president's position, expressed in January, to the victims of U.S. bombing in his own country: not only does not condemn them but it has explicitly committed to conceal the responsibility American himself by claiming the attacks against Islamist groups. Worried about arms trafficking and drugs, Yemeni President Ali Abdullah Saleh, said in passing, to the attention of U.S. General David Petraeus, worry more than whiskey does arrive, "provided it is good .
France, political dwarf
What about France? Confirming what we already knew: hostility diplomats from the Elysee , the first head, Jean-David Levitte, the place of Iran State "fascist" or Venezuela, led by this "crazy" of Hugo Chavez. More remarkable is the revelation concerning the former defense minister, Herve Morin : in an interview conducted last February with his U.S. counterpart, the chairman of the New Center has shown some resistance to U.S. wishes, criticizing the desirability of a new missile defense system under the aegis of NATO or the distancing of Russia in transactions of military equipment. Incidentally, the memo reveals an amazing thing: the disavowal of the minister by his own subordinates who informed the Americans that his "opinion" only reflected his own. It is also discussed in this confidential report sent secret special forces tried to free French journalists from France 3 detained in Afghanistan or the commitment of U.S. Secretary of Defense not to embarrass the French, on the question delicate military reinforcement, during the campaign for regional elections.
To the delight of Tel Aviv
"These [revelations] do not at all Israel, maybe even do the opposite, "acknowledged Giora Eiland, retired Israeli general and former advisor to Ariel Sharon. These documents, he says, "show that Arab countries like Saudi Arabia are focusing more on Iran than Israeli-Palestinian conflict, for example." Prime Minister is even more enthusiastic: "For the first time in history, there is a consensus that Iran is a threat." Lyrical, Benjamin Netanyahu wants to appear as a pacifist: "If the disclosure brings leaders in the region to speak out against Tehran as the revelations have contributed to peace in the world, "says it. Pray not to smile, the documents revealed no Wikileaks, describing a growing nuclear threat from Iran, Turkey's links with Al Qaeda in Iraq, Pakistan and the danger of discord within the Arab League do delights of Tel Aviv who work, as everyone knows, for "peace in the world." Gideon Levy, Haaretz columnist, did not make a mistake: the end of October, in an editorial satirical, it was welcomed, on behalf Israel, Wikileaks for showing the world that the atrocities of war committed by the Americans were far more serious than those made in 2009 by the Israeli army in Gaza. Thence to suspect that Wikileaks is a clever psychological operations outsourced by the secret services, including Israeli , is an assumption, already popular on the Internet that does anything substantial to date of support. One thing is obvious: in 2010, revelations of the site further embarrassed the United States, its allies Middle East and Iran that have embarrassed other regional powers like China, India and Israel.
Obviously, among the released documents, some may titillate some traditional allies in Tel Aviv so too does it one for Morocco. Having described President Gaddafi of "emotional" and deplored the Islamist danger in southern Algeria, Meir Dagan, former Mossad director (who has just leave office after eight years of loyal service all types) had reported in 2007 to U.S. diplomats that Morocco, faced with terrorism, was doing pretty well, "despite his king." The implication in his eyes, Mohammed VI has no interest in governing the country. Difficult, however, to design, to date, an indignant reaction from Rabat to the place of Tel Aviv for about unfriendly.
Another example of an embarrassment all relative: the revelation of a concern Israeli authorities against Iran before the accession to power of Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. In March 2005, few months before the election of Mayor of Tehran to the presidency, Ariel Sharon already feared the alleged nuclear threat that Iran would in the medium term. In public opinion, the Iranian danger is particularly associated with provocative temperament of Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. The memo from 2005 suggests however that Iran, albeit under the direction of the moderate Mohammad Kathama was already seen as the biggest threat after the timely disposition of that posed by Iraq.
The show must go on
public satisfaction of a Benjamin Netanyahu reveals the identity of the camp cheered by the latest revelations of Wikileaks: not any "American-Zionist axis" but more precisely the fringe of hard American neoconservatives, Israeli and European propagate from fifteen years, the fantasy of an "Islamo-risk nuclear incarnated by Pakistan and Iran and the need, as a corollary, to ensure the security of Israel by all means necessary. The lies and deceit necessary, as illustrated by the myth, still unpunished, weapons of destruction destruction in Iraq.
And the fool's game continues. Sunday, the Italian Minister of Foreign Affairs described the disclosure made by Wikileaks of "diplomatic September 11." Few remember, but in the aftermath of the attacks on New York and the Pentagon, one Benjamin Netanyahu had publicly welcomed the tragedy, saying it was "a good thing for Israel." Nine years later, the same man who admitted have anticipated the revelations of Wikileaks , always knows how to exploit the positive events of his era. Provided they are a mystery as to the true identity of their sponsors.