Norton Cltlmh.exe Conhost.exe

Roland Dumas: "September 11, I do not believe." And you?

Roland Dumas: "September 11, I do not believe it." And you?

Karl Zero, Jean-Marie Bigard, Marion Cotillard, Mathieu Kassovitz ... So far, people who dared question the dogma of the official version of September 11, except atypical case of journalist troublemaker mid mid entertainer, belonged to the middle of the show. Now here is a new voice has risen, this time coming from the political sphere, not a small level: Former foreign minister (1984-1986) and Foreign Affairs (1988-1993) before assuming the presidency of the Constitutional Council - which he has illustrated include uttering the validation campaign accounts illegal Jacques Chirac and Edouard Balladur, but that's another story - Roland Dumas made his coming out on the issue of debate Tonight or Never France 3 on Thursday. "I'll tell you what I think about Sept. 11: I do not think" , he dropped . Follows a hubbub - imagine, it comes to blaspheme Live! - Hence escapes "You live on 11 September" addressed collectively probably his three opponents, the very Atlanticist Pierre Lellouche, Secretary of State for Foreign Trade, the philosopher and Therese Delpech essayist Guy Sorman, then, in response to an indignant "There are limits" : "The limits are those you set, it is not mine. Me, I hate this attempt intellectual dictatorship which has no raison d'etre . He explained to Oumma.com : " You said last night's show Taddeï Frederick does not believe in Sept. 11. What do you mean by that? Well, I think it can not be more clear! I do not believe what was told about it.
What do you do referring specifically?
There are a lot of facts abnormal in the official version. I read and studied a lot of research done on this issue. Many items do not: just look, for example, if the hole in the plane into the Pentagon, much too small, or on other lesser known aspects.
The official version you think she more deceptive or incomplete?
Again, just take a serious look on it to get an idea. I do not want, for now, come back to that and comment on reviews, but actually, the official version does not. "
In fact, in the general media indifference, the site Reopen 9 / 11 has published in November the video interview a chemist who, after analysis of dust from the World Trade Center (WTC ), revealed the presence of nanothermite after five other researchers before him reached the same conclusion. Nanothermite which is an ingredient used in controlled demolitions . And December 7, the same site has set line, without echo, a fascinating article in Foreign Policy Journal explains how the investigation of insider trading around September 11 (eg speculation against airlines and insurers affected), assessed by the former German minister Andreas von Bulow to 15 billion euros, were model denial. Here is the conclusion: " In the first days following the 9 / 11, financial regulators around the world expressed unprecedented elements showing the existence of insider trading in connection with the terrorist attacks of that day. The president of a central bank (Welteke) explained that there were "incontrovertible evidence" such financial transactions. This evidence led U.S. regulators to take oath before Congress, to bring those responsible to justice. These promises were not kept, as exemplified by the attitude of those in charge of the investigation, which cleared the responsibility of suspects by superficial investigations, and concluded that insider trading could not have occurred, they were not made directly by Osama bin Laden or al Qaeda. "thorough investigations" conducted by the FBI relied upon the report of the Commission on 11 / 9, were clearly biased. the FBI did not hear the suspects and did not seem to want to approach the Commission on 11 / 9 for the Comparative Study of notes to determine which of the respondents were likely to relate with al-Qaeda. The synthesis of the memorandum Commission suggests that the FBI simply took decisions on its own as regards the possible relationship between the suspects and the alleged terrorist organizations. These unilateral decisions were not appropriate, given that at least three potential cases of insider trading (those of Walker, the trader Viisage and that of Wellington Management) involved logically links with Osama bin Laden or his family . Another suspect (Elgindy) was a criminal about to be convicted, and had direct links with employees FBI arrested latest security breach ... The FBI also defended in August 2003 that he had no knowledge of hard disks recovered from the WTC , what had [yet] been publicly announced in 2001. According to those who have collected the relevant data, hard disks have revealed "repugnant transactions of the Last Judgement" (dirty doomsday dealings). The indices of insider trading around the 11 / 9 involve numerous financial channels, from stocks to Treasury bills, through transfer credit card facts WTC just before its destruction. Today we know that financial experts worldwide have provided strong evidence, using proven and reliable statistical techniques, showing that the earlier suspicions of experts were justified and that the insider trading of 11 / 9 actually occurred. People knew in advance the crimes of 11 / 9 and they took advantage. These people are among us today, and our families and communities may suffer further terrorist attacks and new financial crimes if we do not take account of this evidence. It is time to open an independent investigation and international insider trading and traders who took advantage of the terrorist acts of September 11. " And on September 11 themselves! In reality, the attitude of the proponents of the official, who excommunicate their opponents in all of the taxing "conspiracy" , is best summarized by the following illustration.