RESPONSE
to Christine Lagarde,
sinister Finance
August 17, 2007:
"We have reason to keep, not a crash. This is a sharp correction in markets has its epicenter in a sub-property market in the U.S., the subprime loans aggressive mortgage income households random. There were there large excess in this area. We are now witnessing an adjustment. Small shareholders should keep a cool head. "
(competent economists, who never speak to JT knew them, he could be so!)
At his press conference in response to remarks by Eric Cantona, the Minister of Finance said
"Everyone must do his job, Mr. Cantona makes his own, I I do mine. "
What is your profession, in fact, Madam? We expect at least a minister of the economy is a bit "Economist". But you, Master Lagarde, by what route you're glad you found any of the key government positions? What qualifies you more than Mr Cantona for this position?
Let's review your impressive CV, published on WIKIPEDIA .
Before being appointed head of several departments including where you were responsible to take care of economy, finance, employment and industry with the result, the ranking returned by the Horns of the info in the video below above, you were a lawyer and businesswoman in one of the largest U.S. law firm for 25 years. You were ranked 5th European Business Woman in 2002 by the Wall Street Journal Europe, 30th most powerful woman in the world by Forbes magazine in 2006, and another 100 th most influential person in the world in 2009 and 2010 by the Times. You worked for the supervisory board of ING Group.
At first glance, it appears that you have spent virtually your entire career to defending the commercial interests of foreign powers rather than ordinary citizens of your country. Oh, not that we have a problem with that, but to defend the financial interests of the population French in all categories , your journey a little skeptical. Especially when you discover that you co-chaired with Zbigniew Brzezinski a think tank working including déglinguage .. oops ... the liberalization of Poland.
Zbigniew Brzezinski ... this great democrat who concerned about the political awakening of the masses,
Your journey has made you a woman whose goal was contrary to the service to the nation. You have been programmed to destroy the nation of which you claim to defend citizens by subjecting it to draft your pals G20, full heart of a financial crisis was putting the West on his knees, was organizing a small meeting for the modest sum of one billion dollars.
defend the economic interests of the French nation and French citizens is he really the career for you, Master Lagarde? Are you close enough to them to really understand that their interests are not reflected in the project of global economic governance as the actors of the economic doldrums we know that we prepare?
You're right, Madam, everyone should do his job. Go back to defend the interests of people in your area in a law office. The office of Minister of Economy of a sovereign state must be exercised by a person whose economy work for all is truly a vocation.
Between you and Mr Cantona, we have chosen. In the field, Cantona did not score against his side, he!
Since Wednesday, the media coverage of the revolution by the banks of December 7, operation global citizen, has increased exponentially.
You hear talk about it everywhere, on radio, on TV and in newspapers.
But when we hear discussions about this action, or rather the opinion, we see that the people for and against, not thinking so much or are evidence of bad faith.
When economists well established in their posts when the political elites, bankers and executives deem harmful or irresponsible action is understandable.
This action is a revolutionary act , do not forget all our leaders and political elites, and even our journalists have done great schools, are attached to this system which has both an advantage and allows them to live a good life. Do not expect to hear the prompt us to withdraw our money December 7th .
What I say may sound populist, if you want, I'm just in the sense of common interest, that our leaders too often forget to do.
Here are the arguments quite low for these people who advocate the establishment.
You will trigger an economic disaster:
Yes, that's how the rich will be richer, because they will lose their actions and investments in tax havens. We must realize that we can never change society without the fall of this system, leaders are too powerful and control the media, advertising, lack of social debates, the television room imbecility The absence of citizen participation in politics, this is all we will always be more stupid. We can change everything, 7, and before and after.
The more modest will be hit first:
The first, perhaps, but the rich, they will lose much more than all of us, indeed, they do not have their wealth in cash but make them grow as I said above. Obviously a revolution, or an overhaul of the company, it's a small sacrifice, but then to come out victorious. 
You'll still put France in a stalemate with your strikes and actions against repeat-productive:
The initiative is global, it was portrayed in over 28 countries and 200 000 people are awaiting response on the international group.
Currently there are more than 80,000 worldwide. In France, we are 35 000, only on facebook, you can see on Facebook that almost one in four said participant. Similar proportions are certainly within the French population. So the more the media talk about the action, the more the media will lead us to the participants, it will be easy to get over a million to create queues at the counters of 26,000 bank branches in France. Not to mention the rest of the world.
is utopian.
So there, no! Just as only those who are against this system, and disapprove of the pension reform go out at least their maximum allowed daily, € 300, December 7, before and after, if banks are still there.
Those who want to do so did not have enough money:
We have enough French to possess small amounts of savings accounts, and we can also withdraw money from our children to turn to shelters. Many children have money placed by their parents booklets. We'll see if people are close enough to get involved. But I repeat, the wealthy have their money invested in stock, and not in cash, and it's a liquidity crisis that is at stake here, so it should not put his money in the bank after three days, wait a month, you'll see.
There are other means to rebel against the system:
Really? Who, events? 2 million on the street and it does not matter, riots then, yes, surely it would work, but it's much safer to go withdraw money in the bank than fighting against the SRF. Elections? The G20 and company are not they supposed to reform the global financial crisis that has caused the world? And yet, already 3 years since we talk, but nothing, nyet. Illusions. Simply because the states are in debt from private banks, then how to reform them?
Not the right time, in December we prepare Christmas shopping:
Yes, those who are against this system should prove that we can spend a happy holiday by eating less, made a small strike consumption to keep the liquid removed to create a liquidity crisis, which will turn into political crisis.
This period is also a good choice because Europe is in turmoil with major student movements in England and Italy, as well as protests against austerity measures taken by governments across Europe.
can not affect more than our interests
First, know that, counting the collection of insurance fees for credit card and all that stuff, it costs you more than your interest . Then, you are normal, that, without working, just having a large sum of money, you can always have more, doing nothing? This ever-widening inequalities. And the interests of the rich, they far exceed the cost of their card. When they did not put their money in stock or they affect many more.
You will all make you rob:
It is well known to withdraw 1000 euros or 300 euros, one needs a large bag or suitcase gray!
Thieves know all the years that in general people who go to the wickets are going to walk away with money, yet you accost you there?
This is the same kind of stupidity that "If you're going to show you'll get hit"
And people do what they will with their money?:
Best advice is to keep his money safe at home or at relatives, anyway, if the stock market would rethink everything to recreate a more just society. Otherwise, people who participate should not put their money in the bank for several months, and if they can find a cooperative is even better. Also avoid spending any money withdrawn, in fact, the purpose of action is to withdraw enough cash (notes, coins) of the economy, so the system can no longer function. must "Kidnapping the liquid"
And what do we do next?
This question shows that this action makes sense "What we do", it means that we must choose a new type of society we, so it shows we have taken power, and for once, we ask citizens what they want. We shall see, there are many alternatives that are not publicized because the world leaders there have no interest. State banks of common interest, part digital, co ..
And you, you know where will we in 5 years with this system?
Banks will still be bailed out by the states and that the people who will still pay.
Well no, if people who break the system to free themselves and regain their power, people can no longer be confused by the system policy and finance.
All attacks on Cantona:
"Cantona can afford it, he has the money," "A footballer it must remain a footballer"
Cantona is just a citizen as one that has the media coverage of an action, not a guru or even an organizer, any attack on him is meaningless. This proves the lack of arguments of the ruling class, which in basically says: Do not revolution, we need the system. It is sure to live in a system, we need this system, but we want to live in this system there longer? when inequality and exploitation are increasing, competition dominates?
We must understand that if one tightens its belt, it's because of global finance, the same which redistributes the same bonus as before.
Pension reform is due to them too, and yes, since the Treaty of Maastricht, European states can not create money, but to borrow huge interest rates to private banks, the debt is created by these huge interests, which are repaid with our taxes!
Do not replace most money in the bank three days after the operation, it takes maybe a month before the repercussions resulting from the fall global financial system.
0 comments:
Post a Comment