September 11: Towards a shift of scientific opinion?

baston This scientist does has little meaning to the extent that the camp

opponent will always be able to produce 10 times more with

references at least equal or superior.

In fact, the shape is unimportant relative to the bottom, because experts and experts-cons will compete long time.

By cons, in hindsight, it is quite obvious that such an operation, planning and even more success, can not possibly be the work of a band of retards who train in simulators and steered the zincs with plastic cutlery and small cutters, all led by a fanatic in a cave. To this end, swinging a huge airliner at full speed into a building is like wanting to seek a match with a dart, go.

All this has only relative importance to the examination without the convenience of skiing: Planning a
operation of this magnitude requires hundreds of people and years.
dormant agents, infiltrators, financial coordinators, liaison officers, stewardship, suicide bombers, and the necessary fuses. These circuits must be triplets, quadruplets and more, completely sealed from each other. The governing structure is on top of a pyramid, whose agents must be interchangeable, expendable and replaceable at any time immediately.

The financial circuits themselves require at least as many staff as operational land, and organized the same way. The liaison officers interface type finance / logistics / stewardship / land must be multiplied, also replaceable, and almost impossible to compartmentalize. Financial resources for all these networks are logically imply huge and so vast networks of bleaching. Planners must be present on every continent, at every stage, and own their own networks. Communications at all levels to be effective need to be multiplying endlessly, but can never be totally safe.
capabilities of leakage of security are still other networks to maintain and control that must be Therefore the material resources to be effective.

Each planning stage must have multiple alternative scenarios and a single man can not be the sole custodian of all complex operations at all levels.
Transversality level flowchart of intermediaries is a huge weakness.
Such networks can be free of seepage and leakage, which makes it even more hypothetical completely successful.

But the worst is ahead The infiltration.
infiltration of the workings of the U.S. administration at the highest level and in all directions civil aviation at the Pentagon through NORAD, claiming lives devoted to it, to sabotage, camouflage, and set fire windows. Again, we would find the same mode as the operational part, but much more sensitive in planning, communications, connections and reporters. Part information is crucial in the context of this operation.
At this level the device, the Ratag one of them cancels the operation.

The total for all underground is logically inconceivable.

To be credible, that is exactly what the commission official Kean / Hamilton would have to update.

And what have we gotten instead? Totally bullshit assumptions that have no relation to an operational mode of such magnitude. In their defense, the commission has received only $ 600 000 for work, Kenneth Starr has had 40 million to prove that Bill had stained Monica's dress. Since there are 5 times more resources assigned to investigations of violations of the embargo on Cuba for pursuing bin Laden.

Beyond, not the "small" member of the intelligence services, no military, no country will swallow the official version, and for good reason: The real

power to harm terror cells as we know, is extremely limited.
A truck bomb in the WTC in 1993. A boat packed with explosives against the USS Cole in Yemen in 2000. Some cars against embassies. In London and Madrid, this is more or less successful operations, individual authors and are immediately arrested while their pathetic network is identified and dismantled. What makes the unpredictability of such actions is the very nature of these cells: Single, independent, and a horizontal organization. The opposite of what we have seen above.

How not see evidence the difference in scale between these mosquito bites and an operation such as that from 11/09?
It is also impossible that a terrorist group possesses such a potential nuisance, then who but a powerful intelligence service, own and control the whole chain?

Above all, keep in mind that Operation Northwood (1962), was already planning to kill large numbers of U.S. citizen by his government, with airline and military strikes on buildings.

The current problem, posed by the work on the alternative hypothesis is from 11/09 its great disparity. It is essential to read everything, see everything, to reconstitute the full thread of events. And only then will we have a very clear overview and in which the official story irrefutably appears as a blatant lie.
This effort is essential, because this event is shaping our present and our future, until the possibility of provoking a nuclear conflict. Until this myth will not be dismantled, we will have no opportunity to significantly halt the administration and nihilistic capitalist United States of America.

September 11: Towards a shift of scientific opinion?

Recently, the chemical engineer Mark Basile has confirmed, after testing, the presence of highly flammable materials like nano-thermite (a substance exothermic Hi-Tech exclusively for military use can instantly melt steel) in rubble of the World Trade Center [see his interview filmed ], corroborating the results of analysis of physicist Steven Jones of chemist Niels Harrit University of Copenhagen, and more recently the geo-physicist CNRS researcher and retired Andre Rousseau which we published the study is only available to our association ReOpen911 in May 2010.

These tests need to be considered a priori as farfetched? ReOpen911's opinion is clear: this is simply not possible. Indeed, besides the fact that their authors are experts in resume well filled and perfectly credible, the theory of controlled demolition by the addition of external energy (either by explosives or substances exothermic) is, objectively, the only one to date manages to explain all phenomena observed:

The speed of the fall of the three towers (between 10 and 15 seconds for the Twin Towers ; of 6.5 seconds for WTC7 ), the lower floors had offered virtually no resistance.

Almost perfect symmetry of the three collapses.

Observation of horizontal projections and "explosive" materials during the collapse of the Twin Towers, which beams weighing up to 20 tons [see analysis of these images ejections by physics professor David Chandler].

Collapse of WTC 2: its mass is projected in all directions

Ejections "explosive" material under the curtain of falling debris ;

beam embedded in a tower more than 100 m from the WTC

The presence of molten steel in the ruins of the WTC.

molten steel in the ruins of WTC

Satellite image of 16 Sep.01 showing thermal heat sources "abnormal"

elements of steel and concrete compacted and fused

Violent explosions before collapse caught by cameras and microphones of big media, and was witnessed by many survivors, firemen, policemen and journalists [see videos "anthology of testimonies of explosions in the Twin Towers" and "Explosions at the WTC: Fire show "].

studies and analysis above are they provided in the right? It does not belong to the association ReOpen911 to proclaim itself the arbiter and final judge on this issue. However, the situation is now as follows: we observe a strong and constant acceleration in the pace of publishing studies and scientific analysis that refutes the official version of the collapse of three towers of the World Trade Center. The scientific community would she about to switch on the side of questioning the official version? Note that the proponents of the official version are often not independent, beginning with experts NIST, the agency U.S. government which was responsible for the official investigation into the collapse WTC towers, and under the Department of Commerce (Chairman of the agency that made the reports so controversial was appointed by George W. Bush).

The scientists who dispute the official version, still more, came together in associations or professional groups dedicated to the pursuit of truth and calling for a new investigation:

Architects & Engineers for 9 / 11 Truth , a U.S. involving more than 1,300 architects and engineers [see interview filmed the founder of the association ].

Scientists for 9 / 11 Truth , an association of more than 60 leading U.S. scientists (chemists, physicists, geophysicists ...) [ see the analysis of the NIST report on the collapse of the Twin Towers by physicist Steven Jones and Kevin Ryan chemical engineer].

The Collective for Francophone Scientific Truth September 11, a young group established in September 2010 which brings together scientists whose geo-French physicist and retired researcher at CNRS Andre Rousseau. ;

For all these reasons, the association ReOpen911 calls for public debate on the collapse of three WTC towers . The mainstream media obviously have a role to play in establishing truth function they perform now sometimes (often still too few) in a number of foreign countries, including the United States where even Fox News has made a radical shift in the media coverage of September 11 .

On November 13, barely more than a month after a first issue Fox News which gave the opportunity to Lt. Col. Anthony Shaffer and former member of the CIA Michael Scheuer denounce the fact that there had been cover-ups on September 11 "at the highest levels of government," chain ultraconservative invited on board the news program "Geraldo at Large" two personalities of the Movement for Truth on September 11. The purpose of the program: discuss TV campaign "Building What?" whose objective is to obtain a new investigation into the extraordinary collapse of WTC 7, the third tower to have collapsed Sept. 11, 2001.

before an audience of over one million viewers, the very popular host Geraldo Rivera, who until recently was an outspoken critic of the Movement for Truth on 11 / 9, now recognized to have changed his positions. He concluded the show by saying: "This is something intriguing. I am much more open about it than I was, and because of the commitment of the families of 11 / 9, and all those engineers and architects. Its sounds like a confession mea culpa. Watch this Fox News show subtitled in French:

This is a great success for the campaign "Building What?" ReOpen911 which is an official partner with the families of victims, survivors and rescue workers September 11 represented by the association NYCCAN .

ReOpen911 The association, like the French scientific Collective for Truth on September 11, invited the French scientists - physicists, chemists and civil engineers - to consider issues raised by the collapse of three WTC towers and realize their own studies and tests . At their attention, we have attached to this article a reference list comprising official reports by NIST and a selection of studies and scientific analysis of reference, some support the official version, others disagree.

-La-writing ReOpen911

Bibliography

Official Reports (in chronological order):